<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ALA &#8211; Resuscitating the Catalog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flexyourinfo.com/ala-resuscitating-the-catalog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flexyourinfo.com/ala-resuscitating-the-catalog/</link>
	<description>show off your information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.flexyourinfo.com/ala-resuscitating-the-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flexyourinfo.com/?p=232#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Hi Dawn - I can see how that would be really confusing!  I found it interesting too that at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flexyourinfo.com/ala-social-software-showcase/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Software Showcase&lt;/a&gt; the person who presented the mobile version of their library site said that their search defaults to their Primo search (another discovery layer), but that it currently wasn&#039;t working so you had to use their classic search. Obviously a lot of issues around the addition of discovery layers to catalogs...

I did read the open source software article yesterday and found it to be great, and quite thorough.  I have only had experience with Drupal (just playing around with it personally), but I&#039;m excited by all the possibilities.  What he talks about in the article about libraries hiring programmers is where I think we should definitely be moving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dawn &#8211; I can see how that would be really confusing!  I found it interesting too that at the <a href="http://www.flexyourinfo.com/ala-social-software-showcase/" rel="nofollow">Social Software Showcase</a> the person who presented the mobile version of their library site said that their search defaults to their Primo search (another discovery layer), but that it currently wasn&#8217;t working so you had to use their classic search. Obviously a lot of issues around the addition of discovery layers to catalogs&#8230;</p>
<p>I did read the open source software article yesterday and found it to be great, and quite thorough.  I have only had experience with Drupal (just playing around with it personally), but I&#8217;m excited by all the possibilities.  What he talks about in the article about libraries hiring programmers is where I think we should definitely be moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.flexyourinfo.com/ala-resuscitating-the-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flexyourinfo.com/?p=232#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this, Heather!  It is great for people who couldn&#039;t attend ALA.  The comments from Beth Jefferson really resonate with me.  Her proposal of &quot;less is more&quot; and &quot;making the catalog personal&quot; make sense and are definitely areas I think libraries need to explore.  I know that the San Francisco Public Library uses Encore in addition to its regular OPAC, but the way that they use it can be confusing to a lot of people.  They place an Encore search box directly below the regular search area, with no indication of why someone should use one over the other.  I do prefer to use Encore for my searching, but many times it has not be working properly when I was searching for a book.  There was a great post just yesterday on &lt;a href=&quot;http://inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Library with the Lead Pipe&lt;/a&gt; talking about &lt;a href=&quot;http://inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2009/w-e-b-s-i-t-e-find-out-what-it-means-to-me/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;open source software for libraries&lt;/a&gt; that you may find interesting.  Of the software listed, I have only dealt with Scriblio.  I can confirm that the documentation is horrible, but I am interested to see where it can go in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this, Heather!  It is great for people who couldn&#8217;t attend ALA.  The comments from Beth Jefferson really resonate with me.  Her proposal of &#8220;less is more&#8221; and &#8220;making the catalog personal&#8221; make sense and are definitely areas I think libraries need to explore.  I know that the San Francisco Public Library uses Encore in addition to its regular OPAC, but the way that they use it can be confusing to a lot of people.  They place an Encore search box directly below the regular search area, with no indication of why someone should use one over the other.  I do prefer to use Encore for my searching, but many times it has not be working properly when I was searching for a book.  There was a great post just yesterday on <a href="http://inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/" rel="nofollow">The Library with the Lead Pipe</a> talking about <a href="http://inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2009/w-e-b-s-i-t-e-find-out-what-it-means-to-me/" rel="nofollow">open source software for libraries</a> that you may find interesting.  Of the software listed, I have only dealt with Scriblio.  I can confirm that the documentation is horrible, but I am interested to see where it can go in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
